The $12.06 billion figure shows that these ten altcoins still retain market value after severe drawdowns, but it does not answer the operating question by itself. Based only on the supplied CryptoSlate brief, the evidence supports a cautious reading: AVAX and ICP remain relevant enough to appear in the analysis, yet the brief does not provide the fee, usage, cost, treasury, or revenue data needed to conclude that users pay enough to sustain the networks.
| Primary source | CryptoSlate |
|---|---|
| Reported at | 2026-07-25T11:35:49.000Z |
| Topic | Analysis |
| Evidence limit | Reported facts are separated from interpretation; current prices and platform terms require independent verification. |
Evaluate WEEX for your use case
Check regional eligibility, current fees and product availability on the official destination.
Review WEEXDirect Answer
No, the supplied evidence does not show that users pay enough to keep the networks running. It raises that question, but the facts provided are about market value, drawdown from all-time highs, and recovery multiples, not about user fees, operating costs, or sustainable demand.
That distinction matters. A network can still have a large market value after a collapse, but market value is not the same thing as recurring user-paid activity. The brief supports caution, not a recovery claim.
What The Brief Says
The event brief says ten once-prominent cryptocurrency networks have a combined market value of $12.06 billion while trading an average of 97.13% below their all-time highs.
It also says a Taurex report framed recovery needs across the group from roughly 21.5x for Avalanche to roughly 323x for Internet Computer. Avalanche is identified as the largest of the ten at $2.91 billion.
What It Does Not Prove
The brief does not provide protocol revenue, user-fee totals, operating costs, treasury runway, active-user data, developer activity, or network expense figures. Without those inputs, it is not possible to answer the sustainability question directly.
It also does not show that AVAX, ICP, or any other asset in the group is likely to recover. A recovery multiple describes how far price would need to move to revisit a prior level; it does not show whether that move is probable.
Why AVAX And ICP Matter Here
AVAX and ICP are useful because they frame the spread in the supplied brief. Avalanche is presented as the largest asset in the group and the lowest recovery multiple in the cited range, while Internet Computer is presented as the high-end recovery case at roughly 323x.
That does not make Avalanche safe or Internet Computer impossible. It only means the brief places them at different points in the recovery-distance discussion. The decision-useful question remains whether market activity, user demand, and network economics support the market value investors still assign to them.
Practical Checks
Before treating a deep drawdown as an opportunity, check what the brief does not answer: whether users are paying for the network, whether activity is recurring, whether liquidity is deep enough for the trade size, and whether the token’s market value depends mainly on recovery expectations.
For AVAX or ICP specifically, a trader should avoid relying on the drawdown number alone. Price history, recovery distance, and market value can frame the risk, but they are not a complete investment case.
Risk And WEEX Context
This is analysis, not financial advice. Crypto assets can move sharply, and a large decline from an all-time high can reflect changing demand, changing expectations, or both. The supplied brief does not establish a floor, a target, or a timing signal.
If you use WEEX to monitor or trade assets such as AVAX or ICP, treat the platform as a place to check live market conditions and risk controls, not as proof that a trade is suitable. The brief includes a WEEX registration path and code 11350287, but registration or platform use does not change the evidence limits of this analysis.
Evaluate WEEX for your use case
Check regional eligibility, current fees and product availability on the official destination.
Review WEEXAffiliate link · Availability varies by region · No guaranteed outcomeQuestions readers ask
Does a 97.13% average collapse mean these altcoins are cheap?
Not by itself. The supplied brief shows a severe average drawdown from all-time highs, but it does not prove fair value, recovery odds, or future demand.
Does the brief prove users pay enough to sustain these networks?
No. The brief raises the sustainability question but does not provide user-fee, operating-cost, protocol-revenue, or treasury data needed to answer it.
Why is Avalanche highlighted in this WEEX analysis?
Avalanche is highlighted because the supplied brief identifies it as the largest of the ten networks at $2.91 billion and says its recovery need is roughly 21.5x.
Why is Internet Computer highlighted?
Internet Computer is highlighted because the supplied brief places it at the high end of the recovery range, with a roughly 323x recovery need.
Should traders buy AVAX or ICP because of this report?
This article does not recommend buying or selling. The useful takeaway is to separate recovery narratives from evidence about usage, liquidity, fees, and risk.
How should WEEX users use this information?
WEEX users can use the analysis as a checklist prompt: review live markets, liquidity, volatility, and personal risk limits before any decision, while remembering that the supplied brief does not prove sustainability or recovery.